by Gabe Donio, Gazette Staff
Writer
HAMMONTON—The Hammonton Board of
Education publicly received a forensic audit of
the school district’s finances for the period of
July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2006 during the board’s
regular meeting of March 13.
According to the audit, it was an era when large
deficits occurred and significant mismanagement
reigned in the board business office.
In addition, the audit stated that the board of
education and the county superintendent “do not
properly utilize the monthly Board Secretary
Reports to adequately assess the financial
position of the district.”
The forensic audit was conducted by the New
Jersey State Legislature Office of Legislative
Services Office of the State Auditor “to
determine the primary factors that contributed
to the district’s fiscal year 2005 and fiscal
year 2006 year-end general fund deficits of
$454,000 and $2,186,000, respectively.”
According to the audit, a lack of oversight by
the board and county superintendent helped
contribute to the financial problems of the
district, in addition to mismanagement by the
board business office, which at the time was run
by former Hammonton Board of Education Business
Administrator Lesley Motz. Motz has since left
the district, and has been replaced by Barbara
Prettyman.
According to the audit, fund transfers did not
receive proper approval from the board.
“We found that the business office did not
obtain proper approvals for fund transfers. A
proper review of the Board Secretary Reports
would have identified the increases or decreases
of appropriations (transfers). The board and
county superintendent should have questioned
these transfers,” the forensic audit said.
A recommendation was made by the state audit
regarding the fund transfers.
“We recommend that the board and county
superintendent review the Board Secretary
Reports and investigate transfers and accounts
with insufficient funding. In addition,
transfers should be approved by the board,” the
forensic audit said.
In addition to the board and county
superintendent’s failure to properly review the
budget transfers, several other lapses in
accounting and management which resulted in
substantial deficits in fiscal year 2005 and
2006 at the Hammonton School District were
detailed by the audit report. The forensic audit
is available in its entirety here:
SCHOOL
AUDIT.
“We found that accounting errors for deferred
health benefit payments and budgeting errors
related to transportation services and the child
study team were the main cause of the general
fund deficit in fiscal year 2005.
“We found that the preparation and approval of a
budget that was insufficient to meet the cost of
district programs and services and inadequate
fiscal management practices in the district’s
business office caused the general fund deficit
in fiscal year 2006,” the forensic audit said.
Prettyman reviewed the audit with the board
during the public portion of the meeting on
March 13 and commented on the findings.
“From what I understand, several of these
positions had to do with special education aides
. . . those staff were not included in the
budget,” Prettyman said.
Prettyman was blunt in her criticism of the
board business office and her predecessor.
“It was sloppy recordkeeping, poor performance
in the business office and a failure to keep
good records,” Prettyman said.
According to Prettyman, no findings of criminal
activity regarding public funds were revealed in
the audit.
“They did not say anyone benefited or any funds
were taken,” Prettyman said.
Hammonton Board of Education President Loretta
Rehmann, who was president of the board during
the years noted in the forensic audit, also
commented on the lack of crime associated with
the mismanagement detailed in the forensic
audit.
“When you hear the word ‘forensic’ you think a
crime has been committed. That was not the
case,” Rehmann said.
Board solicitor William Donio did not comment on
the audit during the public meeting.
Rehmann said the board would look to the future,
and assured the public that the district had
dealt with its fiscal problems.
“I’m very happy to say that all of the items
here are no longer a problem for the district .
. . we have put our financial house in order. We
have cleaned up our act. This will never happen
again,” Rehmann said.
Board member Johanna Johnson said it was time
for the district to move forward.
“With this report, this should now put this
issue to bed, so the district may focus on the
future,” Johnson said.
Board member Ralph Condo, who represents
Waterford Twp., asked if the county
superintendent had adequately reviewed the
budget.
No other board members commented publicly about
the audit during the meeting.

|